Dragon’s Laire Baronial Arts & Sciences

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SHEET

Presentation:

Includes both verbal presentation of the entry as well as the ability of the entrant to discuss the entry, its process, its challenges, and field questions.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1
Minimal presentation and/or discussion, etc.
5
Basic presentation and/or discussion, etc.
7
Good presentation and/or discussion, etc.
10
Excellent presentation and/or discussion, etc.

Notes / Comments:

 

 

 

 

Appearance: Stage Presence/Setting the Stage

Includes how the entrant connects and engages the audience, their use of staging and the stage space, etc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1
Minimal connection with the audience with some attempt at staging, etc.
5
Basic connection with the audience with some basic staging and some sense of performance space.
7
Good connection with the audience with good stage presence, use of stage as a tool, clear sense of performance space, etc.
10
Excellent connection with the audience, advanced level of characterization, engagement, use of stage space, etc.

Notes / Comments:

 

 

 

 

Appearance: Artistry/Interpretation

Evaluation of choices made to enhance appeal and/or impact, entrant's interpretation of the piece, etc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1
Minimal artistry and/or interpretation, etc. Some good choices.
5
Basic artistry and/or interpretation, etc. Good choices in keeping with the piece.
7
Good artistry and/or interpretation, etc. Strong choices that add value beyond expectations.
10
Excellent artistry and/or interpretation, etc. Advanced choices in both artistry and interpretation that exceed expectations and enhance audience experience.

Notes / Comments:

 

 

 

 

Process: Technical Execution/Performance

Evaluation of the technical aspects of the entry, delivery, timing, use of space in delivery, etc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1
Minimal execution/performance and understanding/delivery of piece, etc.
5
Basic execution/performance and understanding/delivery of piece, etc. Some aspects successful.
7
Good execution/performance and understanding/delivery of piece, etc. Good use of appropriate techniques, characterization, use of space, voice, movement, props, etc.
10
Excellent execution/performance and understanding/delivery of piece, etc. Strong use of appropriate techniques, etc., with additional elements of virtuosity appropriate to the piece and/or using advanced techniques.

Notes / Comments:

 

 

 

 

Process: Difficulty/Complexity

Evaluation of the difficulty and complexity of a piece, challenges in translation (if applicable), obscure aesthetic, memorization, staging, unusual skills required, etc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1
Minimal or simple piece.
5
Basic piece with some difficulty and/or complexity.
7
Difficult and/or complex piece which includes multiple areas of difficulty and/or complexity.
10
Highly difficult and/or complex piece which requires a high level of skill and/or depth in multiple areas.

Notes / Comments:

 

 

 

 

Historical Context: Authenticity (SKIP THIS SECTION IF PIECE IS AN ORIGINAL WORK)

Evaluation of the historical authenticity of the piece compared to similar examples, period practices, and other aspects of historical accuracy.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1
Minimally historical in aspect, minimal use of historical models and inspiration, etc.
5
Somewhat historical in aspect, some use of historical models and inspiration, etc.
7
Mostly historical in aspect, good use of historical models and inspiration, etc.
10
Excellent historical aspect, excellent use of historical models and inspiration, etc.

Notes / Comments:

 

 

 

 

Historical Context: Originality (SKIP THIS SECTION IF PIECE IS A HISTORIC WORK)

Evaluation of the originality of the piece within the historical context.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1
Minimally original; performance has some elements of personal style.
5
Basic originality; performance mostly unique to the entrant's personal style.
7
Good originality; performance has incorporated period elements(specific posture or body language, period pronunciations, or stylistic elements, etc.).
10
High originality; performance challenges expectations and goes beyond to create a fully original work.

Notes / Comments:

 

 

 

 

Documentation:

Describes the historical context of the item — who may have made and/or used the item, when (what time period) the item is situated, where (geographically and/or socially) the item is situated, and what were the known and possible uses of the item. Also establishes the context of all aspects of the entry in relation to other things of its type.)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1
Minimal documentation, minimal bibliography, etc.
5
Basic documentation and bibliography, etc.
7
Good documentation and bibliography, etc.
10
Excellent documentation and bibliography, etc.

Notes / Comments:

 

 

 

 

Bonus Points:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 - 10 points awarded at the judge's discretion.

Notes / Comments: